We need more than ever to hang on to the arts as the crown jewel of giving us life experiences. And we also need to simultaneously give them tangible purpose by using their gifts more potently as a vehicle to help others achieve, both for ourselves and others, unprecedented economic opportunities. While some of you may view this thought as a curse- having to become more relevant more “accountable”- I see it as true opportunity. It is time we permeate more than just ours, and others, inner worlds but also fuel others abilities with our gifts andÂ help them enrich, motivate and achieve greater outcomes as a result of what we can share. This requires that we build more skills and learn how to influence others, lead our followers into action to better themselves AND, while doing so, financially flourish ourselves.
And yet the kind of narrow thinking David Brooks describes in this NYT piece is exactly what we all should fear if we do not find a way to create meaningful work that has some measure of practical applicability. Thanks James Willney for passing it along for our readers.
History for Dollars By DAVID BROOKS Published: June 7, 2010 in the New York Times
When the going gets tough, the tough take accounting. When the job market worsens, many students figure they canâ€™t indulge in an English or a history major. They have to study something that will lead directly to a job.
So it is almost inevitable that over the next few years, as labor markets struggle, the humanities will continue their long slide. There already has been a nearly 50 percent drop in the portion of liberal arts majors over the past generation, and that trend is bound to accelerate. Once the stars of university life, humanities now play bit roles when prospective students take their college tours. The labs are more glamorous than the libraries.
But allow me to pause for a moment and throw another sandbag on the levee of those trying to resist this tide. Let me stand up for the history, English and art classes, even in the face of todayâ€™s economic realities.
Studying the humanities improves your ability to read and write. No matter what you do in life, you will have a huge advantage if you can read a paragraph and discern its meaning (a rarer talent than you might suppose). You will have enormous power if you are the person in the office who can write a clear and concise memo.
Studying the humanities will give you a familiarity with the language of emotion. In an information economy, many people have the ability to produce a technical innovation: a new MP3 player. Very few people have the ability to create a great brand: the iPod. Branding involves the location and arousal of affection, and you canâ€™t do it unless you are conversant in the language of romance.
Studying the humanities will give you a wealth of analogies. People think by comparison â€” Iraq is either like Vietnam or Bosnia; your boss is like Narcissus or Solon. People who have a wealth of analogies in their minds can think more precisely than those with few analogies. If you go through college without reading Thucydides, Herodotus and Gibbon, youâ€™ll have been cheated out of a great repertoire of comparisons.
Finally, and most importantly, studying the humanities helps you befriend The Big Shaggy.
Let me try to explain. Over the past century or so, people have built various systems to help them understand human behavior: economics, political science, game theory and evolutionary psychology. These systems are useful in many circumstances. But none completely explain behavior because deep down people have passions and drives that donâ€™t lend themselves to systemic modeling. They have yearnings and fears that reside in an inner beast you could call The Big Shaggy.
You can see The Big Shaggy at work when a governor of South Carolina suddenly chucks it all for a love voyage south of the equator, or when a smart, philosophical congressman from Indiana risks everything for an in-office affair.
You can see The Big Shaggy at work when self-destructive overconfidence overtakes oil engineers in the gulf, when go-go enthusiasm intoxicates investment bankers or when bone-chilling distrust grips politics.
Those are the destructive sides of The Big Shaggy. But this tender beast is also responsible for the mysterious but fierce determination that drives Kobe Bryant, the graceful bemusement the Detroit Tigers pitcher Armando Galarraga showed when his perfect game slipped away, the selfless courage soldiers in Afghanistan show when they risk death for buddies or a family they may never see again.
The observant person goes through life asking: Where did that come from? Why did he or she act that way? The answers are hard to come by because the behavior emanates from somewhere deep inside The Big Shaggy.
Technical knowledge stops at the outer edge. If you spend your life riding the links of the Internet, you probably wonâ€™t get too far into The Big Shaggy either, because the fast, effortless prose of blogging (and journalism) lacks the heft to get you deep below.
But over the centuries, there have been rare and strange people who possessed the skill of taking the upheavals of thought that emanate from The Big Shaggy and representing them in the form of story, music, myth, painting, liturgy, architecture, sculpture, landscape and speech. These men and women developed languages that help us understand these yearnings and also educate and mold them. They left rich veins of emotional knowledge that are the subjects of the humanities.
Itâ€™s probably dangerous to enter exclusively into this realm and risk being caught in a cloister, removed from the market and its accountability. But doesnâ€™t it make sense to spend some time in the company of these languages â€” learning to feel different emotions, rehearsing different passions, experiencing different sacred rituals and learning to see in different ways?
Few of us are hewers of wood. We navigate social environments. If youâ€™re dumb about The Big Shaggy, youâ€™ll probably get eaten by it.